| Peer-Reviewed

The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda

Received: 27 April 2021    Accepted: 14 May 2021    Published: 29 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Despite the recommendation for fertilizer use in crop production by research, there is a low rate of adoption among farmers. The low adoption rate of fertilizer usage has been partly attributed to high costs of fertilizer in addition to use of agronomic recommendation without fertilizer economic analysis. The study therefore, set out to determine the profitability of fertilizer micro dosing and weeding regimes in finger millet production in eastern Uganda. A randomized complete block design in split plot treatment arrangement with three replications was used. Weeding regime treatments were the main plot and fertilizer micro dosing treatments as the sub plots. The treatments included: different micro dosing rates of nitrogen and phosphorus, weeding regimes and SEREMI II finger millet variety. Nitrogen was applied in the form of urea (46%), in two splits of 50% each at vegetative and flowering stages respectively. The results of the study indicate that weeding once at 20 Days After Sowing (DAS) and a combination of N and P (16.6 kg N ha-1 and 10.6 kg P ha-1) fertilizer micro dose application is the most profitable combination and could make farmers earn up to Uganda shillings 1,984.220 per hectare compared to only Uganda shillings 373,000 from none application of fertilizer. We therefore conclude that finger millet producers can achieve higher economic and environmental gains when weeding is done once at 20 DAS in combination with sole P fertilizer micro dosing applied at 10.6 kg P ha-1.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16
Page(s) 139-144
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fertilizer Micro Dosing, Time of Weeding, Profitability, Finger Millet, Uganda, Gross Margin

References
[1] Abdalla, E. A., Osman, A. K., Maki, M. A., Nur, F. M., Ali, S. B., & Aune, J. B. (2015). The Response of Sorghum, Groundnut, Sesame, and Cowpea to Seed Priming and Fertilizer Micro-Dosing in South Kordofan State, Sudan. Agronomy, 5 (4), 476–490. https://doaj.org
[2] Asargew, F., & Shibabawu, A. (2014). Appropriate Time for Weed Management for Finger millet (Eleusin coracana Goartn). Journal of Natural Sciences Research, Vol. 4 (16).
[3] Asika, E. R., Chitom, J.-A. R., & Chelichi, I. F. (2017). Appraisal of Human Resource Accounting on Profitability of Corporate Organization. Economics, 6 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20170601.11
[4] Bhimani, A., Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Foster, G. (2008). Management and cost accounting. FinancialTimes Prentice Hall. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jspdawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781408212127
[5] CIMMYT Economics Program (Ed.). (1988). From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual (Completely rev. ed). CIMMYT Economics Program.
[6] Cobo, J. G., Dercon, G., & Cadisch, G. (2010). Nutrient balances in African land use systems across different spatial scales: A review of approaches, challenges and progress. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 136, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.006
[7] Ekwangu, J., Anguria, P., Andiku, C., Tenywa, J. S., Bisikwa, J., Wanyera, N., & Ugen, M. A. (2020). Fertilizer Micro-dosing and Timing of Weeding for Enhancing Finger-Millet Production in Eastern Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (11), p290. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n11p290
[8] ICRISAT. (2006). Fertilizer micro dosing for the prosperity of small-scale farmers in the Sahel (Global Theme on Agro Ecosystem Report No. 23) [Annual report]. ICRISAT.
[9] ICRISAT. (2013). Annual report 2013. Issuu. https://issuu.com/icrisat/docs/annual_report_2013
[10] Jagelavicius, G. (2013). Gross margin management framework for merchandising decisions in companies with large assortment of products. Economics and management, 18 (1), 6-16–16. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.1.4116
[11] Kamara, A. Y., Ewansiha, S. U., & Menkir, A. (2014). Assessment of nitrogen uptake and utilization in drought tolerant and Striga resistant tropical maize varieties. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60 (2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.783204
[12] Knight, A. M., Everman, W. J., Jordan, D. L., Heiniger, R. W., & Smyth, T. J. (2017). Interactions of Nitrogen Source and Rate and Weed Removal Timing Relative to Nitrogen Content in Corn and Weeds and Corn Grain Yield. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2017.
[13] Kyomuhendo, P., Tenywa, M. M., Semalulu, O., Lenssen, A. W., Yost, R. S., Mazur, R. E., Kyebogola, S., & Goettsch, L. H. (2018). Limiting nutrients for bean production on contrasting soil types of Lake Victoria Crescent of Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, 26 (4), 543-554–554. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/acsj/article/view/180284
[14] Mather, D., Waized, B., Ndyetabula, D., Temu, A., & Minde, I. (2016). The profitability of inorganic fertilizer use in smallholder maize production in Tanzania: Implications for alternative strategies to improve Smallholder maize productivity. 45.
[15] Nair, S., Johnson, J., & Wang, C. (2013). Efficiency of Irrigation Water Use: A Review from the Perspectives of Multiple Disciplines. Agronomy Journal, 105, 351–363. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0421
[16] Nestor, A., Clementina Uchenna, A., & Juliet, O. (2017). Effect of human resource accounting on profitability of selected quoted telecommunication firms in Nigeria. Contemporary Issues in Business Management.
[17] Opole, R. A., Prasad, P. V. V., & Staggenborg, S. A. (2013). Effect of seeding and nitrogen fertilizer application rates on field performance of finger millet. 11th African Crop Science Proceedings, Sowing Innovations for ustainable Food and Nutrition Security in Africa. Entebbe, Uganda, 14-17 October, 2013, 127–135. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20163288716
[18] Owere, L., Tongoona, P., Derera, J., & Wanyera, N. (2014). Farmers’ Perceptions of Finger Millet Production Constraints, Varietal Preferences and Their Implications to Finger Millet Breeding in Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6 (12). https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n12p126
[19] Statistical Abstract UBOS 2012. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/pdf%20documents/2012StatisticalAbstract.pdf
[20] Tenywa, J. S., Nyende, P., Kidoido, M., Kasenge, V., Oriokot, J., & Mbowa, S. (1999). Prospects and constraints of finger millet production in Eastern Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 7. No. 4, Pp. 569-583, 1999. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/html/1807/20155/cs99048.html
[21] Tovihoudji, P., Akponikpe, I., Agbossou, E., Bertin, P., & Bielders, C. (2017). Fertilizer microdosing enhances maize yields but may exacerbate nutrient mining in maize cropping systems in northern Benin. Field Crops Research, 213, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.003
[22] UBOS. (2019). UBOS statistical abstract [Survey report].
[23] Velde, M. van der, See, L., You, L., Balkovič, J., Fritz, S., Khabarov, N., Obersteiner, M., & Wood, S. (2013). Affordable Nutrient Solutions for Improved Food Security as Evidenced by Crop Trials. PLOS ONE, 8 (4), e60075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060075
[24] Wanyera, N. M. W. (2007). Finger-millet (Eleusine coracana (L) Gaertn) in Uganda. Proceedings of the First International Finger Millet Stake-Holders Workshop, Projects R8030 & 8445, UK Department for International Development – Crop Protection Programme Held on 13th - 14th September 2005.
[25] Yacouba, O., Taonda, J.-B., Serme, I., Tychon, B., & Bielders, C. (2020). Factors driving cereal response to fertilizer microdosing in sub‐Saharan Africa: A meta‐analysis. Agronomy Journal, 112. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20229
[26] Yanggen, D., Kelly, V., Reardon, T., & Naseem, A. (1998). Incentives for Fertilizer Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Empirical Evidence on Fertilizer Response and Profitability. 129.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Joseph Ekwangu, John Steven Tenywa, Jenipher Bisikwa, Charles Andiku, Helen Opie, et al. (2021). The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(3), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Joseph Ekwangu; John Steven Tenywa; Jenipher Bisikwa; Charles Andiku; Helen Opie, et al. The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 6(3), 139-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Joseph Ekwangu, John Steven Tenywa, Jenipher Bisikwa, Charles Andiku, Helen Opie, et al. The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda. Int J Agric Econ. 2021;6(3):139-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16,
      author = {Joseph Ekwangu and John Steven Tenywa and Jenipher Bisikwa and Charles Andiku and Helen Opie and Paul Anguria and Monday Moses Paga and Deborah Lillian Nambirye and Michael Adrogu Ugen and Nelson Wanyera},
      title = {The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda},
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {139-144},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20210603.16},
      abstract = {Despite the recommendation for fertilizer use in crop production by research, there is a low rate of adoption among farmers. The low adoption rate of fertilizer usage has been partly attributed to high costs of fertilizer in addition to use of agronomic recommendation without fertilizer economic analysis. The study therefore, set out to determine the profitability of fertilizer micro dosing and weeding regimes in finger millet production in eastern Uganda. A randomized complete block design in split plot treatment arrangement with three replications was used. Weeding regime treatments were the main plot and fertilizer micro dosing treatments as the sub plots. The treatments included: different micro dosing rates of nitrogen and phosphorus, weeding regimes and SEREMI II finger millet variety. Nitrogen was applied in the form of urea (46%), in two splits of 50% each at vegetative and flowering stages respectively. The results of the study indicate that weeding once at 20 Days After Sowing (DAS) and a combination of N and P (16.6 kg N ha-1 and 10.6 kg P ha-1) fertilizer micro dose application is the most profitable combination and could make farmers earn up to Uganda shillings 1,984.220 per hectare compared to only Uganda shillings 373,000 from none application of fertilizer. We therefore conclude that finger millet producers can achieve higher economic and environmental gains when weeding is done once at 20 DAS in combination with sole P fertilizer micro dosing applied at 10.6 kg P ha-1.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Profitability of Fertilizer Micro Dosing and Timing of Weeding in Finger Millet Production in the Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda
    AU  - Joseph Ekwangu
    AU  - John Steven Tenywa
    AU  - Jenipher Bisikwa
    AU  - Charles Andiku
    AU  - Helen Opie
    AU  - Paul Anguria
    AU  - Monday Moses Paga
    AU  - Deborah Lillian Nambirye
    AU  - Michael Adrogu Ugen
    AU  - Nelson Wanyera
    Y1  - 2021/06/29
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 139
    EP  - 144
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210603.16
    AB  - Despite the recommendation for fertilizer use in crop production by research, there is a low rate of adoption among farmers. The low adoption rate of fertilizer usage has been partly attributed to high costs of fertilizer in addition to use of agronomic recommendation without fertilizer economic analysis. The study therefore, set out to determine the profitability of fertilizer micro dosing and weeding regimes in finger millet production in eastern Uganda. A randomized complete block design in split plot treatment arrangement with three replications was used. Weeding regime treatments were the main plot and fertilizer micro dosing treatments as the sub plots. The treatments included: different micro dosing rates of nitrogen and phosphorus, weeding regimes and SEREMI II finger millet variety. Nitrogen was applied in the form of urea (46%), in two splits of 50% each at vegetative and flowering stages respectively. The results of the study indicate that weeding once at 20 Days After Sowing (DAS) and a combination of N and P (16.6 kg N ha-1 and 10.6 kg P ha-1) fertilizer micro dose application is the most profitable combination and could make farmers earn up to Uganda shillings 1,984.220 per hectare compared to only Uganda shillings 373,000 from none application of fertilizer. We therefore conclude that finger millet producers can achieve higher economic and environmental gains when weeding is done once at 20 DAS in combination with sole P fertilizer micro dosing applied at 10.6 kg P ha-1.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Ugand

  • Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Ugand

  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Ugand

  • Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Ugand

  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Soroti, Uganda

  • Sections